Contents:
• The War Of 1812: Eastern Theatre
• The War Of 1812: Nova Scotia
• The War Of 1812: Newfoundland
• The War Of 1812: Prisoners of War
• The War Of 1812: Canadian Privateers
• The War Of 1812: American Privateers
• The War Of 1812: William James
The War of 1812 was a conflict between two very different naval powers, a pattern that is far more common in naval history than tends to be appreciated. Aside from a fundamental contrast in their strength – Britain had the world's leading navy while the United States lacked a battle fleet – the opposing sides used their navies for very different purposes. Because no large-scale naval clashes unfolded on the high seas, it is all too easy to underrate the crucial strategic dimensions of naval power and its importance for the character and development of the war... Blockade was seen as the way to deal with American privateering – government-sanctioned attacks on British merchantmen by privately owned vessels – as well as trade. In March 1813, Warren was ordered to blockade New York City, Charleston, Port Royal, Savannah, and New Orleans... Maintaining the blockade, however, was far from easy...
The Hartford Convention was an event in 1814-1815 in the United States in which New England Federalists met to discuss their grievances concerning the ongoing War of 1812 and the political problems arising from the federal government's increasing power. There were impassioned pleas for New England secession and a separate peace with Great Britain. Massachusetts Governor Caleb Strong sent a secret mission to discuss terms with the British for a separate peace. Within the Madison administration, there were fears that New England would negotiate a separate peace with Great Britain, an action in many ways just as harmful to the United States as actual secession. In preparing for a worst-case scenario, Madison moved troops from the New York-Canadian border to Albany where they could quickly be sent to Massachusetts or Connecticut if needed to support federal authority.
The widespread discontent in New England intensified in 1812, when James Madison was re-elected president of the United States. In late 1813 Madison signed a strongly restrictive embargo act prohibiting all trade between American ports (the coastal trade). By the summer of 1814, the war had turned against the Americans. After ending their war with Napoleonic France, Great Britain was able to marshal more resources to North America and had effectively blockaded the entire eastern coastline. Territory in the Maine district of Massachusetts was occupied in July, in August the White House and Capitol were burned, and by September the British were advancing further in Maine and the Lake Champlain area of New York. A naval assault on Boston was expected in the near future. Free trade with the rest of the world had virtually ceased, thousands were thrown out of work, and by August banks were suspending specie payment. The federal government was approaching bankruptcy.
New England governors followed a policy of giving minimal support to the Federal government in waging the war. With the exception of Governor John Taylor Gilman of New Hampshire, most requisitions for state militia were denied. New Englanders were reluctant to have their militia, needed to defend their coasts from British attacks, assigned elsewhere or placed under the command of the regular army. General Winfield Scott, after the war, blamed Madison's policy of ignoring Federalists, who in New England constituted the best educated class, when granting regular army commissions in New England.
The anti-war sentiment in Massachusetts was so strong that even Samuel Dexter, the Republican candidate for governor, opposed the national party's commerce policies. Federalists dominated the 1814 elections, returning Caleb Strong as governor and electing 360 Federalists against only 156 Republicans to the lower house of the Massachusetts Legislature. In September Governor Strong refused a request to provide and support 5,000 troops to retake territory in Maine.
War of 1812
|
War of 1812
|
War of 1812
|
War of 1812
|
|
American Prisoner of War Policy and Practice ...Like earlier and subsequent American conflicts, Prisoner of War (POW) practice during the war (of 1812) was largely improvised by the federal government and the army. Participants in the war were too far removed from the Revolution (1775-1783) to personally remember the practices of the earlier war, and the virtual dissolution of the peacetime army in the intervening decades meant that the lessons of the Revolutionary War would have to be relearned in the latter conflict. One of the most rapid and important changes during the war was the centralizing of POW operations. Other issues included the employment of prisoner of war labor, the concentration of prisoners, and the refusal to repatriate POWs against their will at the end of the war. Local American commanders created a strict policy of retaliation for the mistreatment of American prisoners held by enemy forces. Each of these topics played an important role in shaping American POW policy for the next two centuries.British practice in the War of 1812 was similar to the American Revolution (1775-1783), and Great Britain, which had been engaged in war on the European continent for much of the preceding decade, was able to incorporate American prisoners into a prison system that already held seventy thousand French prisoners by 1812. During the war, American policy developed to address many specific issues, including the use of native allies, the role of captured privateers, and the status of slaves taken by the enemy. Despite the large number of prisoners taken relative to the size of the armies engaged, and the importance of the POW question to the eventual peace treaty, most works discussing the War of 1812 see the POW problem as a minor issue, if it is discussed at all. Often, prisoner issues are lumped into discussions of the British practice of impressments, despite the fact that impressed seamen were not considered prisoners of war, and captured enemies were never impressed into the Royal Navy. Many of the standard works on the war completely ignore POW issues. One significant exception is Donald Hickey's The War of 1812: A Forgotten Conflict, which devotes nearly a chapter to POW issues, and provides a detailed summary of major events in prisoner negotiations and retaliatory measures, but does not address the overall American policy regarding captured enemies. One of the problems faced by the United States in the War of 1812 was the sizeable percentage of Americans in 1812 who had been born in Great Britain. Just as many Americans during the Revolution had maintained loyalty to the British crown, American leaders were faced with the possibility of a large “fifth column” within the United States. A system was quickly instituted to keep track of the numerous “British subjects,” loosely defined as any recent immigrant to the United States, or any individual who had not renounced British citizenship...
Source:— (pages 47-49)
|
|
Exchange of Prisoners of War between the United States and Great Britain 1812-1813: Provisional Agreement for the Exchange of Prisoners
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States be, and he is hereby authorized to make such regulations and arrangements for the safe keeping, support and exchange of prisoners of war as he may deem expedient, until the same shall be otherwise provided for by law; and to carry this act into effect, one hundred thousand dollars be, and the same are hereby appropriated, to be paid out of any monies in the treasury not otherwise appropriated.
Although local battlefield exchanges had taken place, the first formal negotiations between the United States and Great Britain for the exchange of prisoners of war began in November 1812. On 28 November 1812, agents of the United States and Great Britain met at Halifax, Nova Scotia, and concluded a provisional agreement for the exchange of naval prisoners. However, the United States objected to certain portions of the agreement, and it did not go into force. Nevertheless, it did serve as the basis for the Washington Cartel of 1813.
Source:— (page 23)
Provisional Agreement for the Exchange of Prisoners 28 November1812
A PROVISIONAL AGREEMENT, for the Exchange of Naval Prisoners of War made and concluded at HALIFAX, in the Province of NOVA SCOTIA, on the 28th day of November, in the Year of Our Lord One Thousand Eight Hundred and Twelve, between the Government of GREAT BRITAIN and the Government of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA.
|
|
The Wayback Machine has archived copies of this document:
Archived: 2000 December 10
Archived: 2001 October 31
Archived: 2002 August 11
Archived: 2006 July 16
Archived: 2007 October 23
Archived: 2008 May 09
These links were accessed and found to be valid on 23 January 2012.
Note: The /hsbaker/ part of these URLs refers to Mr. Harrison Scott Baker
|
War of 1812
|
War of 1812
|
RN Vessels Lost during 19th Century
A list of ships and vessels late belonging to the British navy,
captured, destroyed, wrecked, foundered, or accidentally burnt
Naval History of Great Britain 1793-1827
by William James, published in 6 volumes in 1837
War of 1812
A writer on naval history, William James was from 1801 to 1813 enrolled
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
Naval Actions |
||
HMS Guerriere |
19 August 1812 |
|
HMS Frolic |
18 September 1812 |
|
HMS Macedonian |
25 October 1812 |
|
HMS Java |
28 December 1812 |
|
HMS Peacock |
24 February 1813 |
|
HMS Shannon |
1 June 1813 |
|
HMS Pelican |
14 August 1813 |
|
HMS Boxer |
5 September 1813 |
|
HMS Phoebe |
28 March 1814 |
|
HMS Orpheus |
20 April 1814 |
|
HMS Epervier |
29 April 1814 |
|
HMS Reindeer |
28 June 1814 |
|
HMS Avon |
1 September 1814 |
|
HMS Endymion |
15 January 1815 |
|
HMS Levant & Cyane |
20 February 1815 |
|
HMS Penguin |
23 March 1815 |
|
HEICS Nautilus |
30 June 1815 |
|
|
HEIC:
Honourable East India Company |
||
|
Privateer Actions |
||
HMS Dominica |
5 August 1813 |
|
HMS St. Lawrence |
26 February 1815 |
|
|
|
W3C CSS Validation Service |
|
W3C Unicorn Validation Service |
|